Focus and Scope

Industry and problems

Scientific specialist publication "Bulletin of postgraduate education: collection of scientific works. Series «Social and Behavioral Sciences; Management and Administration» covers new socio-economic and political relationships that are emerging in Ukraine. Special attention is also paid to the issues of socio-psychological peculiarities of the development of postgraduate education in the conditions of socio-economic transformations, in particular, in psychology, economics, public administration.

Tasks of the journal:

1. To contribute to the creation of an open information environment in order to provide opportunities for the scientific and pedagogical community to highlight the results of modern scientific research and the experience of the best educational practices in the open electronic Internet space; creation of conditions for journalistic discussion and approbation of theoretical and practical scientific and methodological investigations and organization, course and results of pedagogical experiments, which ensures interaction between leading specialists and young scientists in the field of psychology, economics, public administration.

2. To activate the development of the international community of experts in the field of research theory and practice.

3. To contribute to the popularization of the magazine in the modern scientific space.

4. To observe the principles of academic ethics.

The journale publishers articles by leading domestic and foreign scientists, and also popularizes scientific research in general and professional education.

The collection is of interest to heads of educational institutions, methodologists, civil servants and scientists, teachers and students of postgraduate education institutions.

Section Policies

Статті

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The editors of the journal "Herald of Postgraduate Education": the collection of scientific works is governed by the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine and the Law of Ukraine "On Copyright and Related Rights. During the editorial and publishing process, it provides technical and informational support to magazine users. It guarantees the confidentiality of the materials submitted to the magazine during the entire editorial and publishing process, takes into account the provisions of the Law of Ukraine "On the Protection of Personal Data" and the general data protection regulation GDPR. Takes into account comments and suggestions of readers, authors and reviewers regarding ways to improve the work of the publication. Reviewers and editors conduct an impartial review of manuscripts, observing confidentiality, and declare in advance the presence of a conflict of interest. The editors carefully consider all controversial situations and violations; if necessary, adjusts or removes materials. The editors promptly respond to any complaints regarding the work of the journal and guarantee the resolution of all problematic situations. The editors ensure that the readers are properly informed about the publication of the newly published publication. Guarantees that all published scientific materials have been peer-reviewed by qualified experts

Open Access Policy

Open Access Policy

The journal provides readers with immediate free access to all published content under Creative Commons ("Із зазначенням авторства - Некомерційне використання - Поширення на тих же умовах") 4.0 Міжнародна (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Users are free to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.

Archiving

This journal uses the LOCKSS system for distributed archival storage of published content across multiple libraries and information centers. Libraries participating in the LOCKSS project guarantee long-term preservation of comprehensive archives of the journal and automatic recovery of damaged information. More...

Methodology for assessing the verification of the scientific nature of the article

Scientific nature of the article: An article presenting the results of one's own research, which was empirical, theoretical, technical or analytical, which provides the title of the publication, the names of the authors together with their affiliations and which presents the current state of knowledge, the research methodology, the course of the research process, its results and conclusions, with a bibliography. Scientific articles are also considered as monographic, polemical or review studies and legal commentaries. Presence in the article: Structure of the article; Review of the model; Clear and aesthetic layout of the article; Publication of the review procedure; Keywords in the original language; Keywords in English; Literature; Translation and transliteration.

Review Form

FORM OF REVIEW Title of the article _____________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Name and surname of the reviewer ______________________________________________________ Date of receiving article for review _______________________________________________________ 1. The content of the article corresponds to the topic (profile) of the journal (choose):  Yes.  No. 2. The title of the article corresponds to the content of the material and its purpose: (choose):  Yes.  No. Title suggestions: ____________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Remarks on annotations (choose):  no remarks;  need to be expanded;  need to be reduced;  the content of the annotation does not correspond to the content of the research;  clarify the content (see comment);  other. Keywords are adequate articles (not less than 5 words) (choose):  Yes.  No. Comments: _________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4. The manuscript does not include the following structural components (choose):  formulation of the problem;  analysis of recent researches and publications;  the purpose of the article;  conclusions;  all structural elements are available. 5. Relevance of the research is substantiated (choose):  sufficiently;  not enough. 6. Originality of the material (choose):  available;  not present. 7. Notes on the analysis of literary sources and publications (choose):  no remarks;  no references to some sources;  some sources do not match the content of the research;  availability of foreign sources;  lack of new sources (or outdated sources);  should be finalized ____________________. Comments: _________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 8. Remarks to the article's purpose (choose):  no remarks;  needs clarification; 2  does not correspond to the content of the material. Comments: _________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 9. Is scientific reasoning in the content of the article logical and convincing? (choose):  Yes.  No. Are the results of the study methodologically correctly presented? (choose):  Yes.  No. The text of the article needs to be edited (choose):  stylistic inaccuracies;  clarification of terminology;  spelling mistakes;  punctuation mistakes;  grammatical mistakes;  scientific editing; Comments: _________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ 10. Plagiarism (choose):  available;  separate elements of the article;  not present. 11. Conclusions:  no remarks;  do not correspond to the structure and tasks of the article;  not sufficiently substantiated. 11. Recommendations for the editorial board (choose):  Accept an article – the article is ready for publication and is accepted without change.  It is necessary to make corrections – it is accepted, if the author will take into account the given comments.  Return to re-review – necessary revision of the article and re-reviewing it.  Send to another edition – because the subject on the topic reveals another direction of research and does not correspond to the thematic policy of the journal.  Reject an article – an article does not comply the requirements of the publication, contains plagiarism or other reason indicated by the reviewer. Additional comments and suggestions to the author __________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of the reviewer _______________________________ Date of submission of the review to the editorial office _______________________