Approaches to understanding the essence of values and their systems

Ayten Dashdemirova

Анотація


Research shows that not only in pedagogical science, but also in other sciences, the lack of a specific unified interpretation of the term “value” itself causes certain difficulties. Despite the widespread use of the term “value” both in everyday speech and in various sciences, its abstract nature remains. In the sciences, values are given different definitions, such as a psychological phenomenon, a topic of philosophical discussion, or an economic value. There is no generally accepted single definition of values. Some philosophers even argue that this concept cannot be defined. A study conducted in 1969 noted that there were about 180 definitions of the concept “value” or corresponding synonyms. All this follows from the fact that the concept of values is a vague concept. This ambiguity stems from the fact that the concept has both an objective and a subjective meaning. On the one hand, values are rules and responsibilities that do not depend on people and the lifestyle norms arising from them, and on the other hand, values are an individual’s ideas about what is more important for his life. At the same time, if we take into account that the prevailing way of thinking in modern conditions requires consideration of social processes in an interdisciplinary relationship, then the uncertainty inherent in concepts in general can be considered both an advantage and a disadvantage. Disadvantage – because it makes it difficult for different points of view to understand each other. As an advantage, because opposing aspects can balance each other. The article examines special studies by a number of foreign experts on such issues as values, their nature and content, characteristic features, and also analyzes and explores what the essence of values is. Consequently, to clarify the content of this understanding, it is necessary to turn to philosophical, sociological, psychological and pedagogical approaches. Otherwise, the attitude towards values and the approach to them may be one-sided. In this case, as in the approaches found in psychological and pedagogical literature, positions may coincide with each other

Ключові слова


value; essence; phenomenon; ability; need; moral standards; teachers; students; approaches

Повний текст:

PDF (English)

Посилання


REFERENCES / СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ

S. F. Anisimov, “The Theory of Values in Russian Philosophy XX century", Bulletin of Moscow University, No. 4, series 7, рp. 12–14, 1994.

O. M. Bakuradze, “Truth and value”, Questions of Philosophy, No. 7, рp. 48–57, 1966.

V. A. Vasilenko, “Value and value relations”, in Problems of value in philosophy. Moscow, Russia, 1966, рp. 52–63.

M. Weber, Favorites. The image of society. Moscow, Russia: Lawyer, 1994.

E. Durkheim, On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow, Russia, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://is.gd/NJNMhr Дата звернення: Січ. 05, 2024.

I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo, 2007.

A. G. Zdravomyslov, Needs, interests, values. Moscow, Russia: Knowledge, 2000.

G. Lotze, Microcosm. Thoughts on the natural and everyday history of mankind. Anthropology experience. Moscow, Russia: K. Soldatenkov Publishing House, 1866.

I. S. Narsky, “Value and utility”, Philosophical Sciences, No. 3, рp. 50–58, 1969.

T. Parsons, Action Frame and General Action System Theory: Culture, Personality, and the Place of Social Systems. Moscow, Russia, 1994.

E. A. Podolskaya, Value orientations and the problem of personality activity. Kharkov, Ukraine: Osnova. 1991.

Ya. A. Rozin, Methodological problems in the analysis of the formation of value forms. Kuibyshev, Russia, 1985.

S. L. Rubinstein, Man and the World. Moscow, Russia: Education, 1997.

M. Scheler, Selected Works. Moscow, Russia: Gnosis, 1994.

K. H. Hillmann, Wertwandel: Ursachen, Tendenzen, Folgen. Würzburg: Carolus-Verlag. 2003.

H. Klages, T. Gensicke, «Wertesynthese – funktional oder dysfunctional», Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Nr. 58(2), рp. 332–351, 2006.

TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED / ПЕРЕКЛАД, ТРАНСЛІТЕРАЦІЯ

S. F. Anisimov, «Teoriya cennostej v russkoj filosofii XX veka», Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, № 4, seriya 7, s. 12–14, 1994. (in Russian)

O. M. Bakuradze, «Istina i cennost'», Voprosy filosofii, № 7, s. 48–57, 1966. (in Russian)

V. A. Vasilenko, «Cennost' i cennostnye otnosheniya», v Problemy cennosti v filosofii. Moskva, Rossiya, 1966, s. 52–63. (in Russian)

M. Veber, Izbrannoe. Obraz obshchestva. Moskva, Rossiya : YUrist, 1994. (in Russian)

E. Durkheim, On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow, Russia, 1991. [Online]. Available: https://is.gd/NJNMhr Data zvernennia: Sich. 05, 2024. (in Russian)

I. Kant, Kritika chistogo razuma. Moskva, Rossiya : Eksmo, 2007. (in Russian)

A. G. Zdravomyslov, Potrebnosti, interesy, cennosti. Moskva, Rossiya: Znanie, 2000. (in Russian)

G. Lotce, Mikrokosm. Mysli o estestvennoj i bytovoj istorii chelovechestva. Opyt antropologii. Moskva, Rossiya: Izd-vo K. Soldatenkova, 1866. (in Russian)

I. S. Narskij, «Cennost' i poleznost'», Filosofskie nauki, № 3, s. 50–58, 1969. (in Russian)

T. Parsons, Sistema koordinat dejstviya i obshchaya teoriya sistemy dejstviya: kul'tura, lichnost' i mesto social'nyh sistem. Moskva, Rossiya, 1994. (in Russian)

E. A. Podol'skaya, Cennostnye orientacii i problema aktivnosti lichnosti. Har'kov, Ukraina : Osnova. 1991. (in Russian)

YA. A. Rozin, Metodologicheskie problemy analiza stanovleniya cennostnyh form. Kujbyshev, Rossiya, 1985. (in Russian)

S. L. Rubinshtejn, CHelovek i mir. Moskva, Rossiya: Prosveshchenie, 1997. (in Russian)

M. SHeler, Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moskva, Rossiya: Gnozis, 1994. (in Russian)

K. H. Hillmann, Wertwandel: Ursachen, Tendenzen, Folgen. Würzburg: Carolus-Verlag. 2003. (in German)

H. Klages, T. Gensicke, «Wertesynthese – funktional oder dysfunctional», Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Nr. 58(2), рp. 332–351, 2006. (in German)


Посилання

  • Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.